शनिवार, सितंबर 03, 2011

Chyetanya Kunte's original blog post against Brkha dutt ! which removed by NDTV's Pressure !

Chyetanya Kunte's original blog post against Brkha dutt ! which removed by NDTV's Pressure !

This is the blog post which led to Chyetanya Kunte being served a legal notice. I've put it up for those who haven't read it, using my Constitutional Right to Expression, and also my Constitutional Freedom of Speech. There's also the RTI Act, which you can use incase you or I are served with a few notices/other signs of crankiness from anyone.
Before i post this, let me clarify a few things, lest i hurt another journalist's feelings. Journo's are meant to be all tough and smart and all.. what happened to them ? Have they been watching too much Bush ?
  • I do not "hate/loathe/despise NDTV or any of it's affiliated networks
  • I harbour no personal grudges against Barkha Dutt, i am merely "disappointed" that she let me down.
  • I do not like what the media in general did during 26/11 in terms of leaking information and being insensitive with people who had lost their loved ones.
  • I feel that the media needs to be sensitized more, they're getting highly overconfident about themselves.
  • Id like the media and everyone else to read through their rights and realize that everyone is equal and has the same rights. Just because you're a journalist doesn't spare you from criticism.. especially if you deserve it.
Here goes -

This is the original Piece written by Chyetanya Kunte
 but later on he had to retract because of legal pressure from NDTV. I have posted it here for posterity & preservation since Google Cache may clear it anytime.
Shoddy journalism


Appalling journalism. Absolute blasphemy! As I watch the news from home, I am dumbfounded to see Barkha Dutt of NDTV break every rule of ethical journalism in reporting the Mumbai mayhem. Take a couple of instances for example:

In one instance she asks a husband about his wife being stuck, or held as a hostage. The poor guy adds in the end about where she was last hiding. Aired! My dear friends with AK-47s, our national news is helping you. Go get those still in. And be sure to thank NDTV for not censoring this bit of information.

In another instance, a General sort of suggests that there were no hostages in Oberoi Trident. (Clever.) Then, our heroine of revelations calls the head of Oberoi, and the idiot confirms a possibility of 100 or more people still in the building. Hello! Guys with guns, you’ve got more goats to slay. But before you do, you’ve got to love NDTV and more precisely Ms. Dutt. She’s your official intelligence from Ground zero.
You do not need to be a journalist to understand the basic premise of ethics, which starts with protecting victims first; and that is done by avoiding key information from being aired publicly—such as but not limited to revealing the number of possible people still in, the hideouts of hostages and people stuck in buildings.
Imagine you’re one of those sorry souls holed-up in one of those bathrooms, or kitchens. A journalist pulls your kin outside and asks about your last contact on national television, and other prying details. In a bout of emotion, if they happen to reveal more details, you are sure going to hell. Remember these are hotels, where in all likelihood, every room has a television. All a terrorist needs to do is listen to Ms. Barkha Dutt’s latest achievement of extracting information from your relative, based on your last phone-call or SMS. And you’re shafted—courtesy NDTV.1
If the terrorists don’t manage to shove you in to your private hell, the journalists on national television will certainly help you get there. One of the criticisms about Barkha Dutt on Wikipedia reads thus:
During the Kargil conflict, Indian Army sources repeatedly complained to her channel that she was giving away locations in her broadcasts, thus causing Indian casualties.
Looks like the idiot journalist has not learned anything since then. I join a number of bloggers pleading her to shut the f⋅⋅⋅ up.
Update: In fact, I am willing to believe that Hemant Karkare died because these channels showed him prepare (wear helmet, wear bullet-proof vest.) in excruciating detail live on television. And they in turn targeted him where he was unprotected. The brave officer succumbed to bullets in the neck.
Update 2 [28.Nov.2300hrs]: Better sense appears to have prevailed in the latter half of today—either willfully, or by Government coercion2, and Live broadcasts are now being limited to non-action zones. Telecast of action troops and strategy is now not being aired live. Thank goodness for that.
Update 3 [30.Nov.1900hrs]: DNA India reports about a UK couple ask media to report carefully:
The terrorists were watching CNN and they came down from where they were in a lift after hearing about us on TV.
— Lynne Shaw in an interview.
1. Oh, they have a lame excuse pronouncing that the television connections in the hotel has been cut, and therefore it is okay to broadcast. Like hell!
2. I’m thinking coercion, since Government has just denied renewing CNN’s rights to air video today; must’ve have surely worked as a rude warning to the Indian domestic channels

कोई टिप्पणी नहीं:

एक टिप्पणी भेजें